Judging Criteria

Download Judging Criteria Here

Evaluation Criteria for Idea Stage

Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Content Points
Personal Growth 1. Moral and Ethical Development: This criterion assesses the project’s alignment with positive values, fostering patriotism, and adherence to ethical standards. It also considers the project’s contribution to cultivating an innovative spirit within the team members.

2. In-depth Research: This criterion examines the project’s engagement with China’s national conditions and encourages students to conduct thorough research and validation by immersing themselves in relevant social settings, industries, and experimental environments during the project selection, development, and testing phases.

3. Logical Reasoning: This criterion assesses the project’s logical framework and its effective integration of specialized knowledge and business acumen to generate commercial or social value. It examines how the project demonstrates the fundamental processes and logic of innovation and entrepreneurship, showcasing the impact of innovation education on students’ fundamental competencies and cognitive development.

4. Knowledge Mastery and Application: This evaluates the team’s proficiency in the knowledge (specialized, business, industry-specific, etc.) and skills (planning, organizing, leading, controlling, innovating, etc.) necessary for innovation and entrepreneurship. It also assesses the team’s ability to apply classroom and laboratory knowledge to solve practical problems, demonstrating critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Furthermore, it considers how the project has enhanced the team members’ innovative spirit, awareness, and abilities, highlighting the effectiveness of innovation education in improving students’ comprehensive abilities.

5. Demonstration of Educational Outcomes: This criterion assesses how the project reflects the achievements of the institution in advancing "New Engineering," "New Medicine," "New Agriculture," and "New Liberal Arts" initiatives. It also considers the institution’s support in project cultivation and incubation. Furthermore, it examines the role of industry-academia collaboration, integration of science and education, interdisciplinary approaches, integration of specialized and entrepreneurial education, and collaborative innovation in the project’s development and execution. 		30
Project Innovation 1. Problem-Oriented Approach: This criterion assesses the project’s adherence to the typical innovation process, from initial concept to research and development, prototyping, production, and market entry. It examines the project’s ability to bridge the gap between concept and practice, and from basic research to applied research.

2. Goal-Oriented Approach: This evaluates the team’s ability to leverage disciplinary knowledge and apply innovative concepts and paradigms to address real-world societal and market needs.

3. Innovation Outcomes: This criterion assesses the project’s tangible innovation outcomes, considering product innovation, process innovation, service innovation, and business model innovation. The quantity and quality of these outcomes will be evaluated to reflect the team’s innovative capabilities.

Evaluation of project’s innovation process and impact. 		30
Industrial Value 1. Industry Understanding: This criterion assesses the team’s comprehension of the relevant industry landscape, including its size, growth rate, competitive dynamics, trends, and relevant policies.

2. Market Positioning: This evaluates the project’s target market definition and the team’s understanding of the target market’s characteristics and needs. It also considers the development of a sound business model, encompassing marketing, operations, and financial plans, reflecting the team’s business acumen.

3. Implementation Prospects: This criterion assesses the project’s feasibility and potential for successful implementation, considering its potential contribution to regional economic development and industrial upgrading. It also evaluates the project’s current or potential profitability and its prospects for international development.

4. Societal Impact: This evaluates the project’s broader societal contributions, including its direct or indirect impact on job creation (both quantity and quality), and its positive influence on social progress, environmental sustainability, and public welfare. 		25
Teamwork 1. Team Spirit: This criterion assesses the team’s shared sense of purpose, collaborative spirit, and possession of the necessary knowledge, skills, and experience to support the project’s growth.

2. Team Structure: This evaluates the rationality and effectiveness of the team’s organizational structure, personnel allocation, division of labor, skillset composition, professional backgrounds, collaboration mechanisms, and incentive systems. The inclusion of international students is encouraged to promote cross-cultural collaboration and exchange.

3. Team Effectiveness: This criterion assesses the authenticity and strength of the relationship between the team and the project, the level of commitment and resources invested in the project, and the potential for establishing a startup company based on the project.

4. Resource Acquisition and Utilization: This evaluates the team’s ability to leverage external resources, such as partnerships and collaborations, to support project development, and the nature of the relationship between these resources and the project. 		15

Evaluation Criteria for Startup Stage

Evaluation Criteria Evaluation Content Points
Personal Growth 1. Moral and Ethical Development: This criterion assesses the project’s alignment with positive values, fostering patriotism, and adherence to ethical standards. It also considers the project’s contribution to cultivating an innovative spirit within the team members.

2. In-depth Research: This evaluates the project’s engagement with real-world challenges and its connection to the needs of society. Projects demonstrating thorough research, including fieldwork, industry analysis, and experimental validation, will score higher. This criterion encourages students to address practical issues and develop solutions grounded in real-world understanding.

3. Logical Reasoning: This criterion assesses the project’s logical framework and its effective integration of specialized knowledge and business acumen to generate commercial or social value. It examines how the project demonstrates the fundamental processes and logic of innovation and entrepreneurship, showcasing the impact of innovation education on students’ fundamental competencies and cognitive development.

4. Knowledge Mastery and Application: This evaluates the team’s proficiency in the knowledge (specialized, business, industry-specific, etc.) and skills (planning, organizing, leading, controlling, innovating, etc.) necessary for innovation and entrepreneurship. It also assesses the team’s ability to apply classroom and laboratory knowledge to solve practical problems, demonstrating critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Furthermore, it considers how the project has enhanced the team members’ innovative spirit, awareness, and abilities, highlighting the effectiveness of innovation education in improving students’ comprehensive abilities.

5. Demonstration of Educational Outcomes: This criterion assesses how the project reflects the achievements of the institution in advancing "New Engineering," "New Medicine," "New Agriculture," and "New Liberal Arts" initiatives. It also considers the institution’s support in project cultivation and incubation. Furthermore, it examines the role of industry-academia collaboration, integration of science and education, interdisciplinary approaches, integration of specialized and entrepreneurial education, and collaborative innovation in the project’s development and execution. 		25
Project Innovation 1. Problem-Oriented Approach: This criterion assesses the project’s adherence to the typical innovation process, from initial concept to research and development, prototyping, production, and market entry. It examines the project’s ability to bridge the gap between concept and practice, and from basic research to applied research.

2. Goal-Oriented Approach: This evaluates the team’s ability to leverage disciplinary knowledge and apply innovative concepts and paradigms to address real-world societal and market needs.

3. Innovation Outcomes: This criterion assesses the project’s tangible innovation outcomes, considering product innovation, process innovation, service innovation, and business model innovation. The evaluation considers both the quantity and quality of these outcomes and, importantly, the market validation they have received.

4. Future Growth Potential: This criterion evaluates the project’s ability to design and coordinate its innovation strategy, processes, organizational structure, systems, and culture to effectively manage innovation and maintain the company’s competitiveness. 		30
Industrial Value 1. Industry Analysis: This criterion assesses the team’s understanding of the industry landscape (size, growth rate, competitive landscape, trends, and policies) and their target market (characteristics and needs). It also evaluates the completeness, innovativeness, and feasibility of the project’s business model.

2. Business Performance: This criterion focuses on the project’s track record, including its operational history, current revenue (or contracts/orders), profitability, sustainability of earnings, market share, customer base, tax contributions, and return on investment.

3. Business Management: This criterion evaluates the clarity of the project’s development goals, the comprehensiveness of its R&D, production, operations, and marketing systems, and the adoption of advanced and scientific management methods to ensure competitiveness.

4. Growth Prospects: This criterion assesses the clarity, effectiveness, and comprehensiveness of the project’s growth strategy, including its access to necessary internal and external resources (talent, funding, technology) to execute the strategy and establish a sustainable competitive advantage. It also considers the project’s potential for international expansion.

5. Financial Management: This criterion focuses on the project’s financing history, funding sources, cash flow management, funding needs, and the judicious use of funds.

6. Societal Impact: This evaluates the project’s broader societal contributions, including job creation (both quantity and quality), its potential contribution to regional economic development and industrial upgrading, and positive influence on social progress, environmental sustainability, and public welfare. 		30
Teamwork 1. Team Spirit: This criterion assesses the team’s shared sense of purpose, collaborative spirit, and possession of the necessary knowledge, skills, experience, and established external networks to support the project’s growth.

2. Team Structure: This evaluates the company’s organizational structure, clarity of reporting lines, decision-making processes, role assignments, division of labor, professional competencies, internal communication mechanisms, equity structure, and incentive systems. The inclusion of international students is encouraged to promote cross-cultural collaboration and exchange.

3. Team Effectiveness: This criterion assesses the team’s commitment to the project, as evidenced by the level of resources invested, and the stability of the team’s composition.

4. Resource Acquisition and Utilization: This evaluates the company’s ability to leverage external resources, such as partnerships and collaborations, to support its development and the nature of the relationship between these resources and the company. 		15